

I believe you are asking a sincere question, and not out of
antagonism. Your question deserves a response. Stalin murdered a great
many Jews. He banished all religion from the USSR. Stalin was anti
religion in general. Hitler blamed his country's post WW1 troubles on
the "International Jew". He formulated the Final Solution. I was born
eight years after V-J Day, but I remember relatives with serial numbers
tattooed on their forearms. Hitler ordered horrendous medical
experiments on Jewish camp prisoners. Hitler murdered 13 million
people. (Only) 6 million of those were Jews. Stalin's atrocities were
committed in his country. Hitler scoured all of Europe to exterminate
Jews. Read the Nuremberg Laws, defining who was a German citizen
and the ban on intermarriage. The focused carnage by Hitler on Jews was
unprecedented. I've no problem with collectors of WW2 war relics of the
Nazi regime. My father brought Japanese war relics home after WW2. That
didn't make him a Japanese sympathizer. Collectors of Nazi relics are
not, in my book, sympathizers. Nazi items, with a Swastika, do evoke
very negative emotions in Jews that were born long after the war ended.
It represents, to them, an ongoing reminder of a concept to rid the
world of the Jewish people. This concept refuses to die. Whether it
comes from the mouth of Richard Butler of Aryan Nations or a lunatic
that just last Saturday shot and wounded nine Orthodox Jews walking in
the street on their Sabbath. Ask yourself this: If a group had a
charter to rid the world of YOUR people, and they had a symbol
representing their cause, wouldn't you be even a little concerned?
Think about it.
Sincerely,
R. Mermelstein