![]() |
Gun Owners Alliance |
Alliance (e li'ens) -A close
association for a common objective.
15 November 2002
"Jury Orders Gun Distributor To Pay $1.2M To Widow"
Chris W. Stark -
Director & email editor
![]()
This type of court judgment should be protested LOUDLY, with our State
and Federal Legislators. We DO NOT want such a judgment to establish a trend
within this Nation, for obvious reasons!
Will auto makers now be liable for drunk driver's actions? And how many other examples can one give? Numerous!
I am seeking suggestions as to how we can combat this eronious action.
With Respect,
Gun Owners Alliance
Chris W. Stark - Director
****************************
http://www.click10.com/sh/news/stories/nat-news-178698620021114-161148.html
Jury Orders Gun Distributor To Pay $1.2M To Widow
Landmark Civil Case Stems From 13-Year-Old's Murder Of Fla. Teacher
Updated: 9:26 p.m. EST November 14, 2002
WEST PALM BEACH, Fla. -- A jury has awarded a Florida woman $1.2 million
from a gun distributor that sold the gun used to kill her husband two years
ago. Pam Grunow's lawsuit accused Valor Corp. of distributing a gun that
was "unsafe, defective and lacked features that would have prevented a minor
from using it."
Thirteen-year-old Nathaniel Brazill used the gun to kill his teacher, Barry
Grunow, Pam's husband, in a West Palm Beach classroom in 2000. Brazill was
convicted of second-degree murder and sentenced to 28 years in prison.
Pam Grunow's lawyer asked for $76 million. But the jury found gun distributor
Valor Corp. 5 percent liable for Grunow's death. The owner of the gun and
the school board held most of the liability, the jury found.
The jury didn't find any liability for Brazill, who pulled the trigger. Brazill
stole the unloaded gun and bullets from a cookie tin stashed away in a dresser
drawer of family friend Elmore McCray.
The jury said Grunow's family should get $24 million from the three parties.
The school board was told to pay her $10.8 million, and the family friend
was told to pay $12 million.
This is the first lawsuit in the country in which a gun company has been held responsible in a murder.
=========
NOTE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material is distributed
without profit or payment to those who have expressed a prior interest in
receiving this information for non-profit research and educational purposes
only.